Short Sales are Getting Shorter in the Triangle Area of NC

August 12, 2012 by  
Filed under Short Sale How To

Fannie & Freddie Say 30 Days for Short Sale Review, 60 Days Maximum for Raleigh, Durham, Cary & Wake Forest North Carolina

The only thing short about a short sale is the payment on the existing mortgage. The time for review is way too long. To correct this problem, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac issued new guidelines to their servicers. See http://www.freddiemac.com/sell/guide/bulletins/pdf/bll1209.pdf for Bulletin 2012-9 by Freddie Mac. Similarly, see https://www.efanniemae.com/sf/guides/ssg/annltrs/pdf/2012/svc1207.pdf for Servicing Guide Announcement SVC 2012-07

The servicer is supposed to respond to the submission of a short sale package within 3 business days. From the time a complete package is submitted, including a proposed North Carolina Offer to Purchase and Contract and Short Sale Addendum, the servicer is supposed to respond to the proposed short sale within 30 days. If the servicer does not approve or disapprove the short sale within that time limit, the servicer is required to give the borrower a weekly report until there is a decision. The regulations say the decision must be made within a masimum of 60 days.

Are all the servicers in compliance with this requirement? Are you kidding? The last one I talked to on a Freddie Mac loan for a Raleigh Short Sale listing laughed when I pointed out this regulation, then said it would take 90 to 120 days.

Other programs like Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternative (HAFA) specify that the servicer is supposed to respond the the short sale offer within 30 days if you have a HAFA approved short sale in process. Watch this video for a better understanding http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFH6tpdAZXI

Once the servicers get into compliance with these requirements, short sales will become much more acceptable to buyers. The number of buyers who will wait 30 days for an answer is much higher than the number of buyers who will wait 6 months. Any suggestions on how to get wider compliance with these rules?

If you own property in NC or are in the Research Triangle area and perhaps may need to Short Sale your home or business, please call or email Tim to request a confidential appointment regarding your specific requirements to Short Sale real estate in Raleigh, Durham, Cary, Wake Forest or other surrounding Research Triangle area towns in North Carolina.

Don’t Have Short Sale Moving Problems

March 31, 2009 by  
Filed under Short Sale Do's & Don'ts

moving-van-for-short-sale-closingIn a real estate short sale, you have a seller with no money who needs to move out of the property. As a part of Realtor training that I have done for agents in Raleigh and Cary, North Carolina, we have to discuss how moving costs money, and have a plan for the proper thing to do.

The best answer occurs when the home mortgage lender allows some payment to the seller at the closing of the home sale that can be used for moving expenses. Some payment is permitted under the HUD Preforeclosure Sales Program to the seller, a sales program used to stop foreclosure and allow the mortgage loss mitigation of a short sale to replace a foreclosure sale. In general, the seller gets $750 at closing. If the property sells quickly, the seller gets $1,000. This money can be received in cash at closing and used for anything the seller wants, such as moving expenses. The seller will also be reimbursed for the cost of the appraisal and title search required by this program and a portion of the legal fees incurred. So, the seller can get some additional money back at closing, even though the seller does not fully pay off the mortgage loan.

Some short sale agents tell the buyer to pay money to the seller outside of the closing, or outside of escrow, so it does not show up on the closing statement. One of the requirements for short sales is that all parties have to certify to the lender getting the short payment that the seller is not getting anything out of the sale. I disagree strongly with having the buyer hide the payment to the seller as you are deceiving the home mortgage lender, and I do not think you want trouble with the home loan authorities as a part of the home buying experience Yet, I have been on a Realtor training webinar where the participants discussed this approach. Be careful who you listen to, they may get you in trouble.

There is another seminar leader whose Realtor training is to pay the seller $2,500 for work the seller is doing as a part of selling a home. The examples given are that the seller does the open houses and other work that the agent would otherwise have to do to market the short sale home. So, the agent is merely paying the seller for work that the seller is doing on the agent’s behalf on the property for sale. I have paid other agents to do open houses for me on houses for sale, but the compensation has been around $100. It could be argued that this may have some merit, because it is a payment for services rendered and the mortgage lender may see that there is some way that the payment can be justified, so they may choose not to challenge it. However, this a risky way of selling a home, as the amount of the compensation is out of proportion to the work done. Also, there may be regulations in your state that prevent a Realtor from paying someone for doing work that requires a real estate license. You could take this idea and modify it to pay the seller a reasonable amount for some useful service, particularly a service that does not require a real estate license, then you can justify the payment as a reasonable business arrangement that is not related to the property for sale.

So what do you do to avoid lying to the home mortgage lender? There should be no problem if you want to take the idea above and pay the seller for work done, and pay a reasonable amount for whatever service the seller provides in a field that does not require a real estate license. I have paid agents to hold open houses at my listings in Wake Forest and Rolesville, North Carolina. It would not be that much different if I paid the seller, so long as the payment was properly disclosed.

My favorite approach is to look at the problem in a different light. The problem is the furniture, the cost of moving it and the cost of storing it. So, eliminate the problem and raise cash at the same time. Sell the furniture as a different approach to loss mitigation. There is nothing that prevents the seller of real estate from selling any asset they may have to raise money, including the furniture. Separate from selling a home, just sell the furniture to anyone, and there are auction companies that specialize in selling a home full of furniture. You can also put in your MLS listing that the furniture is for sale. Even if the buyer wants to buy the furniture for a reasonable price, there is nothing I can see that is objectionable. The buyer gets fair value, the seller gets some money, and the seller does not have to pay for the moving and storing of the furniture that was sold.

There is another solution that is relies on the goodness of the community. Particularly where I live in the South, there is a principal of helping people who are down on their luck, particularly a family facing foreclosure. The church members will help the seller move. The relatives will take them in. Other community members will pitch in to help get the family resettled, or take care of the yard after the seller moves. See if you can find other resources to help out the seller so that you are not tempted to mislead those who make mortgage loans.

This is a recurring problem and there are solutions that will not get you in trouble.

Mindy Finds Out It is a Short Sale After Making an Offer

March 18, 2009 by  
Filed under Short Sales Stories

mindy-oberhardt-headshot-1101I worked with Mindy Oberhardt on a short sale home purchase. She had a surprise after she made an offer, because the sellers had used a limited service agent who only entered the home as a MLS listing and that was the extent of the listing agent’s service in selling a home. The fact that it was a short sale was not in the MLS, which resulted in a surprise that Mindy did not deserve as a part of the home buying process. Homes for sale with limited service agents that have high balances on their mortgage loans may put you in an unintended short sale. Here is what she has to say:

During August of 2008, I represented a buyer in his pursuit of a home in Raleigh, North Carolina, that was involved in a real estate short sale. The fact that it was a short sale had not been disclosed in the MLS listing. The listing agent, a limited service agent, had posted the property in the MLS but took no further responsibility in making the property for sale. I was notified by the Sellers directly that the property was a Short Sale Home. I immediately disclosed this material fact to the Buyer and discussed the uncertainties involved in securing a home which was involved in a short sale. My client indicated that he wanted to go forward with the offer. Having not dealt with short sales in the past and putting my client?s best interests as my highest priority I approached Tim Burrell, a colleague in my office who had done many short sales. He partner with me to represent the Buyer and provided a bit of Realtor training at the same time. I explained to the Buyer that Tim had experience which in combination with mine, would increase the likelihood of the offer getting approved by the mortgage lender and would increase the potential of the real estate sale being approved in a more timely manner.

Tim and I worked together to not only explain the process to the Buyer but to guide the Sellers through the process as well. Tim took the lead in securing the detailed paperwork that was necessary to provide a complete package to the loss mitigation department. He interfaced with the mortgage lender on a regular basis to keep the process moving forward. Both Tim and I interfaced with the Buyer on a regular basis to explain where we were in the sequence of events, to answer questions and to keep him realistic regarding his expectations. Both Tim and I were in contact with the Sellers on a regular basis to keep them informed as well.

Tim was able to get short payoff on the home loan approved in less than two months, an amazingly short time frame for this type of transaction. Tim was out of town at a CyberStars Summit, but keeping in touch with the home mortgage lender. While he was checking out of the hotel, he took the mortgage loss mitigation negotiators call. She said the short sale was approved, and we had to close the sale on Monday. Calling on Thursday to get a closing on Monday got Tim’s attention, as it woudl be impossible to get the home buying process completed in that time. After exploring the reason, the negotiator said the Monday closing was necessary to get the exact amount shown on the closing statement paid to the investor. Tim explained that there was no way to get the insepction accomplished, the appraisal done and the loan approved by then. However, he was able to convince the negotiator that the exact amount would be paid to the investor when the closing occurred in a couple of weeks. The negotiator was worried that the payment required for the taxes would decrease the payment to the investor. The buyer paid the little bit of extra money to cover the few days of taxes. The home closed within a reasonable time after approval, once the inspections and the appraisal were completed.

Both parties involved in this transaction were extremely fortunate to have the attention of Tim and myself in this transaction. If they had been left to the limited service agent who did not know how to short sale, I shudder to think what would have happened. I don?t know of many agents that would have had the knowledge that Tim brought to the table to take it from a shocking surprise to a seamless transaction. In addition, both Tim and I took great care to respectfully keep both parties up to date at all times and to calmly guide them through what was undoubtedly a very stressful process.

Don’t Let the Buyer Misunderstand a Short Sale

March 15, 2009 by  
Filed under Short Sale Do's & Don'ts

misunderstood-70Many Realtors have never done a short sale. If they represent buyers, they do not know what to tell them to explain the short sale home buying experience. If you are listing a short sale, be an information resource for the buyer’s agent. Or, send them here as this site provides complete Realtor education on short sales.

The first point to explain about a short sale is that you do not know how long it will take the lender to review the sale. You may have some experience with the same lender, but that does not mean they will be as efficient this time as they were last time. Estimate 45 to 60 days for the review if you do not have any experience with that lender. If the buyers are relocating for a new job that starts in two weeks, they will need to have other living arrangements. So, you need to have a longer than normal time in the contract for the closing date for a short sale home. Take your estimate of how long it will take the lender to review the sale, then add 30 days for the buyer to close the sale.

The agent for the seller needs to stay in touch with the agent for the buyer during the short sale process. You need to have some reports of progress, and tell the agent for the buyer what is being done to move the transaction along. Remember, the buyers do not know whether they bought a house or not, so they are on edge as this is not the typical home buying experience. Let them watch the progress so they can feel that something is being done.

The second point is that negotiating on a short sale is different. The sellers might sign anything at any price, because they want to get rid of the house, out of trouble and possibly avoid foreclosure. This is particularly true if he seller pays no income tax on the amount the payment to the lender is short. You do not have a deal that can close until the lender approves it. Just because the seller agreed does not mean that you can count on that price for as the final sale price of the short sale home. Most of the negotiating is with the lender.

The third point is a short sale is not a sure thing. The lender may not approve the short sale, or if the seller cannot pay the mortgage, the lender may foreclose. The buyer can make it a sure thing by paying enough to fully pay off all the liens, but I have never had a buyer who wanted to do that.

The fourth point is that the house stays on the market in a short sale. Paragraph 6 of the Nort Carolina Short Sale Addendum says that other “offers may be received by the Seller’s agent, which must be presented to the Seller pursuant to North Carolina law. Such offers may be accepted by the Seller as backup contracts and forwarded to Lienholders for review and approval.” The buyer needs to know that the house is still for sale until the contingency for lender approval is eliminated, and the buyer may have to outbid the other offers. Using the term “backup” is not as clear as it should be. If you were a lender who is losing money and the first offer makes you $20,000 less than a second offer, which one would you approve and which one would you disapprove? Since the short sale does not close without the lender’s approval, having the lender disapprove the first offer makes the second one more than a backup offer.

I am working on a short sale in a townhouse in North Raleigh where there is a first mortgage and a line of credit as a second loan. We have had five offers. I started the lender review process with the first offer that was extremely low, but it gave me an opportunity to get on the waiting list. The seller signed it, with the short sale addendum, and we submitted it to both lenders, as both of them would be short in the payment. By the time the file was assigned to a loss mitigation negotiator, we had gone through four more offers. The last one was good enough that only the second loan is a short pay. By the time the last offer came in, the second loan had agreed to accept $2,000 on a prior offer, but I had no approval on the first loan, so the contract still had a contingency. The best offer fully paid the first loan and gave the second loan more than $3,000. Maybe the key to financial recovery is good marketing and better negotiating skills in short selling a home, so that more money is returned to the banks and the homes sell for higher values to support the neighborhood values.

By the way, every time we received a better offer on this townhouse, we went back to the previous offer and gave them a chance to submit their “last, best and final” offer. You need to give all buyers, and all buyer’s agents, every opportunity to be the successful purchaser in a short sale. The Realtors work hard trying to get a house for their clients and you need to give them every chance to get a commission. For more on negotiating when there are multiple offers, see my book Create A Great Deal, the Art of Real Estate Negotiating.

The fifth point is to tell the buyer not to spend any significant amount of money on the short sale until the lender has approved the short payment. The California Short Sale Addendum is one of the best. It is right in specifying that the time limits in the contract run from the time that the lender approves the short sale. Normally, the time limits run from when the contract is signed by the buyer and seller. In a short sale, you should start the time for inspections, loan applications and other contingencies from when the lender approves the sale.

I had a short sale in North Raleigh where the agent for the buyer was an old friend of mine. She did not pay attention when I told her the house was still on the market and that other offers could outbid her clients. The buyer paid for an inspection of the property about a week after the seller signed the contract. I should have been more emphatic in stopping the inspection, but I thought no one else would make an offer on the short sale home as it backed up to a noisy road. When another offer outbid her client, and her client would not raise his price, I did manage to get the buyer reimbursed for the cost of the inspection. But, she is still mad at me. So, learn from my experience and emphatically make sure the buyer does not do anything until the lender has accepted the short sale.

A sixth expectation for a short sale is that the lender is going to try to negotiate to get more money. One potential aggrivation in a short sale is a lender who takes a long time reviewing a short sale, while the values in the area are going down. Then, the lender wants more money to approve the short pay. If the lender comes back quickly with a higher counter offer, it is easier to present to the buyer, as the comparable values may support it. If the lender comes back after an extended period of decline in the values, it is harder to get the buyer to accept the counter offer, because it is harder to have the comparable values support it. Also, it is harder for the appraisal for the buyer’s loan to come in at the purchase price. Luckily, the values in Raleigh are not declining, or just barely declining, so I do not have this problem. But, you need to set the expectation for the agent for the buyer that there may be a counter offer from the bank.

A short sale is a different type of transaction altogether, so you need to explain the differences to the buyer’s agent and the buyer so that they have a home buying experience that is as pleasant as possible.

Powered by WishList Member - Membership Software